Shah Peerally Law Forum is a FREE SERVICE offered to the entire immigrant community from Shah Peerally Law Group PC. Anybody can be a member of this forum – you do not need to be a client to be a member. If you have any question feel free to call us at: 510-742-5887

Disclaimer: We take no responsibility for accuracy of information provided , please use at your own risk. Note: Please do not post any negative comments or remarks about any person or organization. Do not post personal information details. Courts and government agencies can require us to disclose your email, IP address. etc.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Penaltys disguised as Liquidated Damages

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Penaltys disguised as Liquidated Damages

    Hi Shah,

    I have an H1 Visa and a contract agreement for 3 years with my sponsor. In this contract agreement says if I transfer my visa to another company I have to pay the Company one month’s salary for each month left in the Employment Period and to pay the Company 10.000 for relocation costs and immigration costs.
    The contract also has a clause that says "The sums above are agreed upon by Employee and the Company as liquidated damages and not as a penalty"
    Is there any way to avoid this penalty disguised as liquidated damages.

    I found in wikipedia:
    At common law, a liquidated damages clause will not be enforced if its purpose is to punish the wrongdoer/party in breach rather than to compensate the injured party, in which case it is referred to as a penal or penalty clause. However, courts sitting in equity will seek to achieve a fair result and will not enforce a term that will lead to the unjust enrichment of the enforcing party.

    Any advice in my situation will be truly appreciated.

    Regards,

    Tuvaleelfe
    Last edited by tuvaleelfe; 11-24-2012, 02:01 PM.

  • #2
    Dear Tuvaleelfe,

    Thank you for posting this question. This is more an employment contract question and is usually controlled by the State mentioned on the contract or one decided by jurisdiction forum (or by the court). Unfortunately it seems that the liquidated damages might be reasonable. However, it might be an issue in enforcing it. Most of the time, companies hope that no candidate will fight and usually settle it. The cost of hiring a lawyer to defend such cases are so high that most candidates settle it for less. Again, it is a state by state issue. I will recommend you contact an employment or contract attorney to assist you.
    Good luck.er
    Shah Peerally is an attorney licensed in California practicing immigration law and debt settlement. He has featured as an expert legal ****yst for many TV networks such as NDTV, Times Now and Sitarree TV. Articles about Shah Peerally and his work have appeared on newspapers such as San Jose Mercury News, Oakland Tribune, US Fiji Times, Mauritius Le Quotidien, Movers & Shakers and other prominent international newspapers. His work has been commended by Congress women Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Lee. He has a weekly radio show on KLOK 1170AM and frequently participates in legal clinics in churches, temples and mosques.

    For updates follow us onYoutube, Radio, Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. Shah Peerally Law Group PC deals in immigration law - www.peerallylaw.com and www.immigrationlegalblog.com
    Attorney Shah Peerally also deals in debt settlement. For more information call us on 510.742.5887 and visit us on www.YourDebtSettlementAttorney.com.
    Information provided above is for educational purposes only. One should not act or refrain to act solely based on the information provided. You should consult an attorney to assess your case before proceeding.

    Comment

    Working...
    X